I
asked you to show us PROOF that the KJV is the ONLY accurate
version of the Bible,and you obviously ignored that question which
you just-as-obviously read right here! Why did you ignore it?
BECAUSE YOU CANNOT ANSWER IT w/o shooting your Onlyism myth in the
head. You have NO SUCH PROOF!!!
You're stuck in the false doctrine of KJVOism. Let's blow that big
fat lie outta da water RIGHT NOW!!!!
You've been asked before to "Please provide us with ONE HINT of
Scripture from the KJ or any other valid Bible that supports such
malarkey." Since scripture is the HIGHEST WRITTEN AUTHORITY we
have,then any ideas or doctrines ABOUT Scripture MUST BE SUPPORTED
BY SCRIPTURE!!!!! KJVOnlyism has NOT ONE IOTA of such support!
Therefore,it's a MAN-MADE,FALSE DOCTRINE!
Wanna know WHERE KJVOism came from, besides originating from the
devil? Like it or not,here ya go-In 1930, a man named Ben Wilkinson
wrote a book named, "Our Authorized Bible Vindicated". I have read
it cover-to-cover.
Wilkinson's book lay unused and unknown, until 1955 when J. J. Ray
published a little volume, "God Wrote Only One Bible". Ray heavily
plagiarized Wilkinson's book. Ray acknowledges that there are some
erroneous translations in the KJV which do demand revision (pgs. 30-
31, 102), a position today's KJV-Only mainstream would consider rank
heresy.
The other chief disseminator of Wilkinson's misinformation was the
late David Otis Fuller, a Baptist pastor. In 1970 Fuller
issued "Which Bible?", which was in its 5th edition by 1975 and
contained 350 pages. Fuller's book took almost half the information
directly from Wilkinson's "Our Authorized Bible Vindicated", with
some editing to both conceal Wilkinson's cult affiliation, and to
correct some of the worst of his errors. Even so, Wilkinson's
material is still plagued by blatant misstatements of the facts,
distortions, misrepresentations and half-truths.
Also in the third generation, without question the most arrogant and
abusive of the KJV-Only partisans is Peter S. Ruckman, whose torrent
of errors flood virtually every page of Ruckman's published work. He
single-handedly has injected more misinformation into the
controversy than all other writers combined. He even says that the
KJV corrects its Greek, Hebrew, & Aramaic sources!
Edward F. Hills, who wrote "Believing Bible Study" (1967) and
"The
King James Version Defended" (1956, 1973), did not advocate the
inerrancy of the King James Version nor the Origenian origin of the
Septuagint, is neither a founding father nor a star of the first
magnitude of the KJV-Only movement, but may be viewed as a secondary
tributary, whose works are commonly cited wherever his words can be
made to support a writer's point.
Gail Riplinger, who wrote "New Age Bible Versions", claims God was
the author and she was His secretary. She alleges a "Satanic
inspired conspiracy" on the part of "modern Bible versions"
which is
sponsored by the "New Age Movement". Along with other boasts, these
claims were just "too much" for even some of her fellow KJV-Onlyites
to swallow. Yet the book has received the unqualified endorsement of
KJV- Onlyites such as Chick, Ruckman, Jack Hyles, Texe Marrs, J. R.
Chambers, D. A. Waite, Walter Beebe & others.
There is one little problem-DR.WILKINSON,THE "DADDY" OF ALL
THIS
MISINFORMATION,WAS A SEVENTH-DAY-ADVENTIST LEADER-a big shot in a
KNOWN CULT! The SDAs don't believe half the KJV, so how can any
leader of theirs speak with any authority or truth about a Bible he
doesn't fully believe? The whole KJVO thing is tainted from the
gitgo!
Don't believe me? First look up a bio for Benjamin Wilkinson. Then
go to the webpage for UNION COLLEGE & research for WHOM their
Benjamin Wilkinson Library was named!
Now,we'll give ya some unarguable,irrefutable anti-Onlyism
FACTS,STRAIGHT FROM THE KING JAMES BIBLE!!
First,here's Isaiah 61:1-3 from the 1769 Blayney's Edition of the
KJV:
1 The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD hath
anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to
bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and
the opening of the prison to them that are bound;
2 To proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD, and the day of
vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn;
3 To appoint unto them that mourn in Zion, to give unto them
beauty for ashes, the oil of joy for mourning, the garment of praise
for the spirit of heaviness; that they might be called trees of
righteousness, the planting of the LORD, that he might be glorified.
Now, here's Luke 4:16-21 from the same Bible:
16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as
his custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and
stood up for to read.
17 And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet
Esaias. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it
was written,
18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me
to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the
brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering
of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,
19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.
20 And he closed the book, and he gave it again to the minister,
and sat down. And the eyes of all them that were in the synagogue
were fastened on him.
21 And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture
fulfilled in your ears.
Now,let's compare.
Isaiah: The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me;
Luke: The Spirit of the Lord is upon me,
Both sentences the same. So good so far.
Isaiah: because the LORD hath anointed me to preach good tidings
unto the meek;
Luke: because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor;
Meek & poor are NOT the same!
Isaiah: he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted,
Luke: he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted,
Close enuff to be explained by language differences.
Isaiah: to proclaim liberty to the captives,
Luke: to preach deliverance to the captives,
Again,close enuff to be attributed to language differences.
But here's where the differences become so great that they CANNOT be
attributed to language differences!!!!!!!
Isaiah: and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;
Luke: to set at liberty them that are bruised
Bound and bruised are VERY different! But wait! There is ANOTHER
SENTENCE in Luke that comes before the latter one!
Isaiah: Not Found!!!!!!!!
Luke: and recovering of sight to the blind,
MAJOR-LEAGUE DIFFERENCE!!!!!!!
Isaiah: To proclaim the acceptable year of the LORD, and the day of
vengeance of our God; to comfort all that mourn;
Luke: To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.
Close.
But at that point Jesus stopped reading,so Luke 4:19 doesn't contain
the rest of Isaiah 61:2.
There it is,directly from the KJV! Jesus obviously read aloud from
ANOTHER VERSION of the Book of Isaiah,obviously a GREEK version
since Esaias is Isaiah in Greek. And the men to whom He was reading
were Jews,most likely able to speak both Hebrew & Greek, and whom
many among their number had memorized every peep of Scripture. If
Jesus had misread it,they would've instantly called Him down. Its
quite apparent that the version Jesus read is QUITE DIFFERENT from
the "traditional" version used to make the KJV OT translation. Thus,
JESUS HIMSELF-The Word-The AUTHOR of all Scripture not given
directly by God The father-clearly did NOT practice Onlyism!
There are two sets of FACTS that both deny the validity of
KJVOnlyism and show its CULTIC origins! I have many more,just as
irrefutable, but I think these should suffice for now. I highly
recommend you abandon that false doctrine, KJV11611AV, & then maybe
you can begin to climb out of the pit in which you've fallen. One
false doctrine begets another,which begets another, on & on. Dump
the original,& the others will follow!